Gleb Alekseenko vs Mikhail Ledovskikh Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W L L L
Form
L L W W L W L L W LHead To Head: Alekseenko 1 - 1 Ledovskikh
They have played 5 sets in total, with Alekseenko winning 3 and Ledovskikh winning 2. The last match between Alekseenko and Ledovskikh was at the Kazakhstan F4, 26-04-2016, First, Clay with Gleb Alekseenko getting the victory 7-6(1) 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gleb Alekseenko | 1 |
| Mikhail Ledovskikh | 1 |
Kazakhstan F4(26-04-2016)
7
6
7
5
| Alekseenko | Stats | Ledovskikh |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 825 | Highest Rank | 151 |
| 41 | Age | 38 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 40% (173-259) | Career Total W/L | 56% (339-263) |
| $730 | Career Prize Money | $104,030 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alekseenko VS Ledovskikh H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 7-5 |
Stats 
Gleb Alekseenko
Player
Mikhail Ledovskikh
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 2-6 7-5 6-4 | |||||
Alekseenko VS Ledovskikh H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 29 | Games Won | 26 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 0:54:30 | Average Match Time | 0:54:30 |
| 61% (43/70) | 1st Serve % | 47% (35/74) |
| 74% (32/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (28/35) |
| 52% (14/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (15/39) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 42% (31/74) | Return Points Win % | 34% (24/70) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gleb Alekseenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(7) ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Mikhail Ledovskikh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Richard Muzaev
Player
Mikhail Ledovskikh
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
9
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Ledovskikh
Player
Abduvoris Saitmukhamedov
65%
(
11 of
17)
1st Serve %
67%
(
12 of
18)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
11 of
11)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
6%
(
1 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
26
Total Points Won
9
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gleb Alekseenko
Player
Mikhail Ledovskikh
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxim Dubarenco
Player
Mikhail Ledovskikh
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
16
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
33%
(
35 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
110
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Ledovskikh
Player
Andrei Vasilevski
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
46%
(
37 of
80)
6
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Temur Ismailov
Player
Mikhail Ledovskikh
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
14
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikhail Ledovskikh
Player
Michal Konecny
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
8
Aces
17
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Ledovskikh
Player
Denis Yevseyev
50%
(
52 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
108
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(2) 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilya Ivashka
Player
Mikhail Ledovskikh
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
6
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
20 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 40% (173/259) | Win/Loss | 56% (339/263) |
| 41% (395/559) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (770/620) |
| 46% (3893/4531) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6902/6337) |
| 38% (35/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (152/96) |
| 41% (125/180) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (70/72) |
| 41% (13/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (105/85) |
| 0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 53 | Aces Total | 1683 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 316 | Total Double Faults | 536 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 439.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 534.91 |
| 66% (2732/4117) | 1st Serve % | 57% (7359/12816) |
| 54% (1486/2732) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (5617/7359) |
| 37% (514/1384) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2614/5457) |
| 46% (183/395) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (426/1097) |
| 40% (1636/4053) | Return Points Win % | 37% (4673/12787) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (52/53) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/4) | Challenger W/L | 60% (214/144) |
| 41% (172/252) | Futures W/L | 54% (71/60) |
| 40% (169/427) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (337/591) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 53% (34/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (110/218) |
| 45% (43/95) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (101/191) |
| 87% (171/148) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (324/284) |
| 13% (171/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (324/39) |
| 10% (261/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (278/56) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
